Talk:2004–2010 Italian football scandal

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copy Editing edit

Looks like a nice article, but it was clearly written by someone for whom English is their second language. Therefore, wording and syntax in this article need a lot of work for clarity's sake.-RomeW (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suggested Revisions edit

After reading the article, I found that some suggestions for edits are the following:

  • Unclear transition statements. Ex. In addition
  • Linking key terms to other articles.
  • Lists of names within sentences that are explained later in a chart.
  • Grammar (translation differences)

Natt1995 (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Natt1995Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2004–2010 Italian football scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply