Talk:2001–02 South Pacific cyclone season

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.wmo.ch/web/www/TCP/OperationPlans/TCP24-English2004.pdf
  • In 1996–97 South Pacific cyclone season on 2011-05-25 06:24:29, 404 Not Found
  • In 2002–03 Australian region cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:26:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005–06 Australian region cyclone season on 2011-05-26 01:50:29, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000–01 Australian region cyclone season on 2011-06-10 06:32:03, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001–02 Australian region cyclone season on 2011-06-10 08:22:09, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2001–02 South Pacific cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 23:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• " It began on 1 November 2001 and ended on 30 April 2002. These dates conventionally delimit the period of each year when most tropical cyclones form in the southern Pacific Ocean east of 160°E. Additionally, the regional tropical cyclone operational plan defines a tropical cyclone year separately from a tropical cyclone season, and the "tropical cyclone year" runs from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002." - Why are those four dates not in the same format as the other dates? It should be written as month, day, and year to be consistent with the others.

Sorted.Jason Rees (talk) 23:33, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• "The season's sixteen tropical cyclones" - Seems rather odd to say "sixteen tropical cyclones", mostly because it contradicts a later sentence in the article: "During the 2001–02 South Pacific cyclone season, only five tropical cyclones and two severe tropical cyclone formed or entered the region." That is only seven and not sixteen.
  • Changed the first TC to TD Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• "existed within these dates with the first developing on November 30 and the last dissipating on April 23." - If this is true, then why does the infobox for both the lead and Trina's section say it formed on November 29? Second, the "Other storms" section says that Tropical Depression 16F dissipated on April 22.
  • Random....Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• "two severe tropical cyclone formed or entered the region. These number are substantially" - Make both cyclone and number plural.
  • Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• "subtropical jet resulted in the the regular formation of strong" - Repeated word
  • Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• "The first tropical cyclone of the year, Trina formed upper-level low pressure system" - You don't have to do this, but I think it would be better if you said "The first tropical cyclone of the season", rather than "year", as it was November by then.
  • Changed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• "nearly sationary, the storm" - Misspelled word
  • Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• "center of circultaion and on December 24" - Another misspelled word
  • Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• On reference #2, the actual date should be December 4, 2004, rather than simply 2004.
  • Added
• The Gary Padgett links need to be checked, as you have one link going towards the June summ rather than the April Summ.Jason Rees (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Fixed it, good catch JR. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

• Everything has been addressed I believe. Thanks for the review George! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your prompt response to this GAN. I will now pass this article. Regards,--12george1 (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2001–02 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5qqsMtBmz?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.met.gov.fj%2Fdocuments%2FTC_Seasonal_Summary_01-021188357048.pdf to http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_01-021188357048.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927103238/http://www.cidi.org/report/5532 to http://www.cidi.org/report/5532

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)