This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Lineagegeek I believe this squadron should have its article under a name in which it was active. Two options; a WW II squadron that actually fought, or a 4-year-service SAC bombardment squadron. Would recommend 1st Antisubmarine Squadron. Your thoughts? Buckshot06(talk) 14:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
I was thinking the same thing as I was editing the WW II section. This would reverse what I did a couple of years ago, when I was replacing the nonsense that was in articles about B-47 units activated between 1958 and 1962. This will be over a redirect, and I don't believe I have the permissions needed to do this. I will be working on the article over the next couple of days. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
