Talk:1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    WP:MOSNUM requires hard (non-breaking) spaces between numbers and their units. e.g. 150 km/h (click "edit" to see the symbol that makes a hard space). GA reviews don't mind this, but FAC ones certainly do.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    We talked about the image licenses and I am confident that they will be sorted out
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Plasticup T/C 19:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply