This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Dwanyewest: After making some edits to Emma Coss (as you have seen), I happened upon this article, however I have some concerns over how accurate some of the data is. I have found this book which when looking at this particular final match, presents very different info with regards to players who were substituted and at what time (and indeed, the aforementioned footballer may not have even played). Can you advise the ref you used for the figures currently in the article, so that if there are two contrasting sources, it's can be determined which is correct. Thanks. Bungle(talk • contribs) 15:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looks like most of them are copy/pastes, Bungle, which will need to be checked for accuracy. I've corrected a few (e.g. [1]) Dwanyewest and their – ahem – close collaborators User:80.1.188.112 and User:86.28.130.208 do a lot of productive work but unfortunately also inadvertently add a lot of incorrect information. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Bring back Daz Sampson: I suspected it must have been a c&p from somewhere, but without solid evidence of that, thought it best to raise the matter in the event it genuinely was another source presenting things erroneously. As it turns out, the above editor hasn't acknowledged my message, though I did make the relevant adjustments on this article anyway. This had already been NPP reviewed before I noticed. Bungle(talk • contribs) 18:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
