Talk:1993 South Australian state election

Any sources of info for the 1993 election? edit

I'm very suprised considering the importance of that election. I am not finding much useful info in google, it is hard to do much with this page. SEO only goes back to 1997. The original content on this page said the ALP was reduced to 10 seats, the original content on the 1997 page said they were reduced to 11 seats... which ones were lost? Timeshift 20:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alas, internet information is harder the futher back you go. The following is mainly from memory: Labor won back a seat in a by-election after a Liberal member died quite early in the term (like 1994). I'm pretty sure it was originally 10, and so became 11. I remember the comment on election night that, apart from Frank Blevins' seat of Whyalla, you could draw a pair of lines (like Main North Road and Port Road, or something like that), and every single other Labor seat was between those lines. Labor didn't win a single seat South of Adelaide. Go to this site with the 1997 results: http://psephos.adam-carr.net/countries/a/australia/states/saindex.shtml and look at the sitting members in 1997, you can probably work which 10 seats Labor won in 1993. Good luck. Rocksong 00:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Cheers :-) Timeshift 04:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
BTW SA didn't have fixed election dates until after 2002. (i.e. first fixed date election was 2006).Rocksong 04:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
I thought fixed election dates meant the date was known well ahead of time, not fixed 365x4 terms? Timeshift 04:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes they do, but it was not brought in until recently. I thought it was brought in after 2002, but according to Antony Green's election guide ("Minority Government in Fixed Term parliaments", about halfway down), 2002 was the first fixed date election. Rocksong 00:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The map of electorates is not accurate as it reflects the boundaries as at 2006 I think. The electorate boundaries in 1993 were very different.

I'm aware of that but you try finding 1993 boundaries! Timeshift 03:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Labor logo.JPG edit

 

Image:Labor logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

2PP correction source edit

For anyone curious of my latest 2PP adjustments, see "1.16 Election Outcomes" at https://ecsa.sa.gov.au/component/edocman/2014-state-election-statistics/download for 1977-2014 2PP (1989 and 1993 were both 0.1% off). Timeshift (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply