Talk:1991 UNCAF Nations Cup/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 13:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this one as requested due to the previous GAN being closed ☯ Jaguar ☯ 13:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

If anyone is reading this and wondering why this is a quick-pass, please refer to the previous GAN in which I reviewed to and pointed out a few concerns in which they have been now addressed. I can confirm that all points in the previous GAN had been met, and because of that there is nothing else to report. The lead has now been greatly expanded and summairses the article per WP:LEAD. The rest of the article is also as in-depth as can be for this subject. As everything has been addressed in the last GAN, I'll promote it this time ☯ Jaguar ☯ 16:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)