Talk:1991 Cappagh killings
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1991 Cappagh killings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Infobox edit
Should the infobox used be for a military or civilian attack?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- I see one has just been added. Looks good!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Infobox military conflict wouldn't be fitting for this attack, so we'll hav to go with Infobox civilian/terrorist attack. Thankfully the words "civilian attack/terrorist attack" only show-up in the code (when editing the page). ~Asarlaí 09:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Victims' identity edit
While the victims may not have been the UVF's original targets, had there been UDR personnel present at the ambush, they could have been able to identify Quinn, O'Donnell and Nugent as IRA volunteers to the gunmen.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)