Talk:1982 Women's Cricket World Cup
Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review
1982 Women's Cricket World Cup has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 26, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1982 Women's Cricket World Cup/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments
- " in both duration and in the number" -> "both in duration and the number"
- " the West Indies withdrew in protest at the 1981 South African rugby tour of New Zealand." I know the point is to expand this in the prose, but this on the face of it is so bizarre, a hint in the lead wouldn't go amiss...
- Kick those refs out of the lead, they can go where the points are expanded upon in the main body.
- You assume the readers know what "runs", "wickets" and "spinners" are in the lead.
- " filled in a gap to play" I may have missed this before, but should this be something like "a gap in their playing schedule" or similar?
- MCG is abbreviated but never used.
- "a forty overs per side contest" ugh, I think that "forty-overs-per-side" is being used adjectively here so should be hyphenated. Or better, rewrite to avoid.
- "a 60-overs per side contest" likewise. And perhaps some consistency forty/sixty vs 40/60.
- "Invitations were sent to five teams; Australia, England, India, the Netherlands and the West Indies. As in 1978, Sout" Perhaps "Five teams were invited: ... but as in 1978..." to avoid the second short sentence.
- " in protest that New Zealand had" I guess this is apartheid-related but it needs to be spelled out.
- I think we may have a MOSFLAG issue with the invitational XI. Firstly it's almost impossible to see the difference in the Oz and NZ flags, secondly you have a Welsh flag despite the individual having played for England, and thirdly we would normally expect to see these flag names explained the first time of use.
- I've done a host of tidying here. Ultimately, I think it will be replaced by a breakout 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup squads, in the style of 2009 Women's Cricket World Cup squads. But done for the moment. Harrias talk 09:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Heyhoe-Flint is inconsistently hyphenated.
- Our article on Lopamudra Bhattacharji has an "i" at the end of her name.
- Marie Cornish is piped to a redirect back to itself.
- I think you could fit all five team columns in one row and eliminate that nasty blank team cell.
- Wanganui normally has an h.
- I would make the venue table unsortable, when you sort it you get multiple instances of that rowspanned map and it looks dreadful.
- OORRRR put the map to the right of the table outside the wikitable class....
- "was broken only two days later," no need for "only".
- Lots of bold text in these cricket templates, why?
- "Bird became" full name and link first time.
- No images of any players available?
- "just ahead of the" no need for "just"
- " Barb Bevege's " she was Barbara before.
- Link "bowling figures".
- And "five wickets in an innings".
- Is the C in ESPNcricinfo" capitalised or not for the references?
- And italics or not?
- Consistent, e.g. The Age is linked second time (I think) in the refs.
That's enough for a first quick pass before my battery runs out. It's on hold. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Well, turns out I left this as a pile of poo. Will start tidying this afternoon. Harrias talk 12:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fear not. Nothing like some of the GAs I've reviewed!! The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Okay, back for more, please. Harrias talk 08:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- The only thing I didn't note the first time round is the "n.a."s in the fair use justification, those need to be fixed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man:Cheers: I've changed it to a logo specific rationale table, which should have sorted that. Harrias talk 09:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- The only thing I didn't note the first time round is the "n.a."s in the fair use justification, those need to be fixed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Okay, back for more, please. Harrias talk 08:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fear not. Nothing like some of the GAs I've reviewed!! The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
All good, happy to promote now. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)