Talk:1969 Santa Barbara oil spill

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Muzizimu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Expansion edit

This article begs for expansion in this day and age. Also need to maintain the Wikipedia goal of neutrality. It maybe already lacks that when you see the few references and their source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.214.41.30 (talk) 17:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wow. Reading this craptastic article, you would think that the only effect of the spill was the death of 10,000 birds. In fact, for years afterwards, the beaches for over 100 miles south of S.B. were covered with sticky dollops of tar, and the once plentiful shellfish population was all but completely wiped out. It was possible to harvest edible crabs, clams, and mussels along the Southern California coast before the oil spill. Two years later the shellfish were GONE, and have not yet returned in significant quantities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

These updated links for the Daily Nexus sources should be incorporated:

http://www.dailynexus.com/2005-01-28/69-oil-spill-leaves-mark-on-sb-environmentalism/

http://www.dailynexus.com/2005-01-31/a-lasting-legacy-of-offshore-drilling/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.121.40 (talk) 23:49, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite, need pics edit

I'm working on a rewrite of this article in my userspace ... is anyone watchlisting this? Can someone help me find some public domain or copyleft pictures? I'm having a hard time finding anything useful; the best pics are copyright, typically by newspapers and press services. Antandrus (talk) 23:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This was all I could find. Plazak (talk) 03:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you -- definitely useful! It shows how the blowout is bubbling up at a distance from the rig. Antandrus (talk) 04:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Question for Antandrus: Is this the longest article you have ever written from scratch? - Darwinek (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes.  :) History of Santa Barbara is close ... Antandrus (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
See, and you thought nobody will ever notice. :) - Darwinek (talk) 23:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dead link edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 2 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Title edit

Isn't there a better word for this than "spill"? Crude Oil wasn't spilled and what actually happened was an off shore well blew out. I had trouble finding it under "oil spill"; was looking under: 'well blow out'.

Tyrerj (talk) 00:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's the standard naming convention we use -- see for example everything in Category:Oil_spills. I can find one exception, and this is a land event -- the Lakeview Gusher -- but otherwise we seem to use "spill" consistently. Bring it up on the village pump if you have a better idea, but I think "spill" works ok. Antandrus (talk) 02:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pismo Beach Disaster Relief edit

Does this have anything to do with the "Pismo Beach Disaster Relief" mentioned in the 1995 film "Clueless"? 24.6.187.181 (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not that I know of -- do you have a link to a clip of the scene? I know that the spill was detected as far north as Pismo Beach but I don't think it was a serious problem there. Antandrus (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply