Talk:1953 Chinese census

Sources for improvement

China's Changing Population has analysis of the early census data as well as various studies performed in conjunction with them. — LlywelynII 10:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Languages of China in census

Why there is no census statistics for Languages of China--Kaiyr (talk) 06:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 14 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved all per nom. No such user (talk) 10:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

---

• First National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 1953 Chinese census
• Second National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 1964 Chinese census
• Third National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 1982 Chinese census
• Fourth National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 1990 Chinese census
• Fifth National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 2000 Chinese census
• Sixth National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 2010 Chinese census
• Seventh National Population Census of the People's Republic of China → 2020 Chinese census

– Per WP:CONCISE. These names are too long. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 16:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

• Support per WP:OFFICIALNAMES. The current titles are tedious and actually obscure understanding. —  AjaxSmack  19:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
• Support much more CONCISE. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.