Talk:1921–22 Cardiff City F.C. season/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 10:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures edit

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • It contains copyright infringements - No copyvio. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -  Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

  • The 1921–22 season was the 21st season of competitive football played by Cardiff City and - Cardiff City F.C. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC) - DoneReply
  • top tier - highest tier. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC) - DoneReply
  • 31 players made at least one appearance for the club during the campaign - starting a sentence with a number feels weird to me. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC) - DoneReply
  • Average attendence isn't mentioned in the lead, but lowest and highest only? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC) - DoneReply

Background and preseason edit

A levee made of earth, only used here for supporters to stand on rather than to direct water. Kosack (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

First Division edit

  • The game therefore became the first top tier match in English football to be played in Wales - therefore is a bit weird to me. Just because there wasn't Welsh clubs, doesn't mean it wasn't possible for matches to have been held in Wales previously. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think its reasonable to assume that as the first Welsh club to reach that level, the match would consequently be the first to be held in Wales. In the 100-year history of the Football League, I don't believe an English club has ever played a home match outside the country. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
During the era, The Times simply listed "our football correspondent" as the author of the articles. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • stepped in and became the oldest player in the club's history at 41 years old. - Is this still true? Is this just league? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the record still stands and is for all competitions. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • does this section not mention the final position of the team/season results? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC) - AddedReply

Cup matches edit

Player details edit

  • Two of the players, Ernie Anderson and James Melville would never play another match for Cardiff - did these players get released? retired? etc. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC) - ClarifiedReply
  • him out score his... - isn't it outscore. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC) - FixedReply
  • Eleven players scored at least one goal during the course of the season and one opposition player scored an own goal - did cardiff score any own goals? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • rest is good Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
The record books I have only state Cardiff's goalscorers, so I'm unsure of that I'm afraid. Kosack (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notes & References edit

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments edit

  • Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definately not manditory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review Lee, I'll sort out these issues asap. Kosack (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Lee Vilenski: Done up to the point you have reached, cheers. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply