Talk:1895 Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association football season
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Champions edit
Virginia was the Southern champion of 1895, no argument there. North Carolina was second best in Dixie. According to the College Football Warehouse, they were SIAA champions. Though they were involved with the founding of the SIAA, see the sources on that article for why I don't think they were in it for this season (or many at all). The road trip seemed to give them one like Georgia Tech claims one in 1915 despite being independent. Then there's Vandy, which is reasonably ranked in third place, or at worse is tied for third with Auburn. Fuzzy Woodruff says Vandy was the best team in the Cotton States and third best in the South, which is another way to say they were SIAA champs. However, 1897 is Vandy's first traditional title, so it seems the idea of UNC claiming it has legs. Cake (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1895 Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association football season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014352/http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/conference_champs/champions.php?conid=181 to http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/conference_champs/champions.php?conid=181
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)