Talk:1890s in Western fashion

Tagged for cleanup

This is a terrible article. Ethnocentric, gender-biased, badly-written. Zora 23:28, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Tried to fix it up a little. Anyway, it's now part of the series... Churchh

Added aesthetic dress/tea gowns, and links the prior decades to their fashion articles. PKM 02:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Can we make this whole article a little less, well, class-centric. This is about what upper-class people wear, with hardly a mention of middle- and working-class fashions. 82.10.98.240 15:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

working-class fashions

working-class fashions

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Haabet (talk • contribs) 14:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC).

As I have said elsewhere, I tend to think of "fashion" as what is fashionable, that is, the clothing of the upper or upper-middle classes. Lower and working class clothing changes on a different timeline, and up until the mid-19th century at least changed very slowly indeed. I would suggest a separate series on working class and rural clothing, probably by country or region, linked to this series.

That said, there is certainly room to add reference to how fashion was modified or simplified away from court and the "big city". How do readers feel in general about incorporating a broader spectrum of society?

I am concerned that these surveys are getting rather long in some cases. - PKM 19:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Removing cleanup tag

Cleaned it up some more, added material and images, and removed the clean-up tag. Hope you approve, Zora! PKM 04:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://costume.osu.edu/Reforming_Fashion/artistic_dress.htm
  • In 1890s in fashion on 2011-05-25 02:16:26, 404 Not Found
  • In 1890s in fashion on 2011-06-01 23:45:25, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)