Talk:17 (XXXTentacion album)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 17 (XXXTentacion album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about 17 (XXXTentacion album). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 17 (XXXTentacion album) at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
"Reception" section errors and inconsistencies edit
Since around yesterday, the "Reception" section for 17 and XXXTENTACION's other album, ?, have been inconsistent with most other albums' "Reception" sections on Wikipedia. Why is the review aggregate website "AOTY" being used? I've never heard of it before, and the only place it's being used is for XXXTENTACION albums. This is inconsistent with albums from other artists, which use Metacritic. If there is no Metacritic score for an album, then it does not need to be given an aggregate score on the Wikipedia page, especially from relatively unknown websites like "AOTY".
Another error I noticed is the use of music reviewer TheNeedleDrop's reviews. I thought the general Wikipedia rule was that his review scores are not allowed on Wikipedia pages. Why are they on XXXTENTACION's album pages, but not any other artists'? These changes have only happened in the last couple of days, but make no sense at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbxyd (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Charts edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please alter it like that: "Following XXXTentacion's death, 17 returned to the high spots of the worldwide charts, including No. 3 in New Zealand, No. 4 in the Netherlands and No. 7 on the Billboard 200 (55,000 units)[64]."
The US source is the one already used in the old phrase, the Durch source is here and the NZ source is here.
--2A02:B98:473F:3374:B86B:174C:3857:2B8B (talk) 12:47, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi I am xxxtentacion edit
And I love my fans so much 70.94.70.24 (talk) 22:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Xxx edit
Xxx blue flame 103.146.218.27 (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Moinv edit
Fudgbjg Dtyvcv Ghbc Fhvc Vhbv 2402:AD80:110:845A:1:0:75E1:62BA (talk) 08:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
aaaaaa 222.127.153.191 (talk) 16:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)