Talk:1781

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:33, 7 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)Reply

Images edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

[See: Talk:1780#Images. -Wikid77 12:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)]Reply

Format edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

11-December-2006: The article "1781" had been a long list of Events, with no subheaders. People tend to add and mix undated events anywhere, unless month-name subheaders are already in a yearly article. I am adding 2 sets of month headers "January-June" and "July-December" as in other years of the 1780s. -Wikid77 12:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic