Talk:142nd Wing

Name?

Is the name correct or is it a typo? Should it be 142nd Fighter Wing? --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The USANG and USAF use the abbreviation '2d' instead of '2nd' for their official designations, so the page name is correct. Cromdog (talk) 18:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_062707_news_f15_jet_crash_details_body_found.1d9fa8ab.html
  • In 142d Fighter Wing on 2011-05-23 03:02:00, 404 Not Found
  • In 142d Fighter Wing on 2011-06-01 15:31:16, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• https://www.aef.org/magazine/April2002/0402redhawk.pdf
  • In 142d Fighter Wing on 2011-05-23 03:02:00, 404 Not Found
  • In 142d Fighter Wing on 2011-06-01 15:31:26, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Designations

Reference to 373rd Fighter Group is incorrect. This unit was originally designated as the 371st Fighter Group, redesignated 142nd Fighter Group and allocated to Oregon in 1946. Reference is Maurer, Maurer, Editor, "Air Force Combat Units of World War II," Office of Air Force History, Washington D.C. 1983, entry for the 371st Fighter Group, pages 257 - 258. Online at:

Also, reference to the 142nd Fighter Group being redesignated as the 142 Fighter Interceptor Wing in the 1950s is incorrect and a frequently made mistake. The 142nd Fighter Group/Fighter Interceptor Group of that time was a separate organization of the Oregon Air National Guard. The 142nd Air Defense/Fighter Interceptor Wing was a higher-level organization that absorbed resources from Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and maybe even Montana, Air National Guard fighter groups. It had a cadre of its own men at Geiger Field near Spokane, WA, but wing staff were augmented by additional personnel from the ANG fighter groups as required, such as during annual summer training encampments held at Gowen Field, Idaho. Sources for this organization are not easily found, one is an article at: ––Zuke Tower

Zuke, This is a common error. In general, the lineages for the groups allotted to the National Guard in 1946 belong to the current operations groups, not the current wings. There are some exceptions, like the 101st and 128th groups (and their lineages are surprising). BTW, I have moved /s that prevented your post from displaying properly --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Lineagegeek,Thank you for your help with comments display. Understand your point about WWII combat group lineage bestowal to ANG groups after the war. In case of the 142d Fighter Group, it was never a wing until it was redesignated as such in the 1990s. The 142d Fighter-Interceptor/Air Defense Wing was never an Oregon ANG formation, and should be considered a separate organization from the 142d Fighter Group/Fighter-Interceptor Group. Zuke Tower (talk) 01:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

References

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:132d Fighter Wing which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 142nd Fighter Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304053928/http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/ExecSum2007/F-15A_Portland_26Jun07.pdf to http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/ExecSum2007/F-15A_Portland_26Jun07.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)