Talk:1408

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled] edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Contradiction: one article claims Yongle was completed until 1403 while this one states - 1408. Decide !

75.72.127.154 00:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

yongle was commissioned in 1403 not completed

robkehr

Superstition edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As far as I can tell, there has never been any superstition about the number 1408 being unlucky. This idea seems to have originated with the Stephen King story/movie of the same name. If anyone has a source for this being an actual superstition then please feel free to add it back in, but otherwise this should not be in the article. CKarnstein (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic