Talk:12th Reconnaissance Squadron
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 12th Reconnaissance Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Revised and expanded edit
Article has been extensively revised and expanded. Bwmoll3 (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Article edit
Added confusing stub to history section. Needs a little rework on its flow for the normal layperson. Also states de-activation 1992 with no re-activiation date. Oldwildbill 15:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point edit
| Cleanup Co-ordination | |
|---|---|
|
This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page. |
Discussion edit | |
External Links edit
The third link gives me a 403 error. This may be due to the page being closed to all outside addresses or, seeing how it's a US military page, to non-US addresses. If the former is the case, I propose deletion.
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 edit
Article reassessed and graded as stub mainly due to it appear to just be a list which requires major clean up --dashiellx (talk) 17:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)