Talk:12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FenrisAureus (talk · contribs) 07:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello fellow traveller! I will be reviewing this nomination over the course of the next 14 days. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at WP:GAN.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

GA review

Last updated: 12:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC) by FenrisAureus

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

2c) it contains no original research

2a/2b/2c Combined spot check

Reference #	Y/N	Comment
86		—
153		—
52		—
119		—
18		—

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

All things flagged by Earwig seem to be false positives. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 09:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall:

Comments:

Deepest apologies, fellow traveller. I have been trying but I just don't have the focus to review this article right now. Extenuating circumstances necessitate that I withdraw as reviewer. A bot will put the nomination back into the cue. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 12:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)