Talk:108th Cavalry Regiment

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copyright? edit

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/h?pp/PPALL:@field(NUMBER+@band(pan+6a31708))

Is this a copyright image? Its owned by the Library of Congress.

Questionable Statement edit

The Statement "...a 'scout' would have held better position in a Reconnaissance Squadron" sounds biased without a proper Cite. BrassTacks (talk) 16:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Removed said statement which was biased and inaccurate. The transformation of 1-108 AR to 1-108 CAV (RSTA) is better covered here. Javertxiv (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Coat of Arms edit

Has anybody ever found or seen the 108th coat of arms?

Javertxiv (talk) 01:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dead link edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 108th Cavalry Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply