Talk:Βk-2C-B

Source reliability

Should the (un)reliable source tags be used when the article is regarding an extremely novel substance for which there is no novel data? It was thought that this couldn't exist until a couple of months ago. Testem (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

A good lot of the sections have no references at all, I added unreferenced section tag to some of them.

The entire "Structure activity relationships" section sounds like a good, yet unspecific/unsubstantiated hypothesis. DefinitelyNotAScientist (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Correct name

This article should at least display the name as βk-2C-B, even if naming rules prevent it being located there.

structure

Structure presented is 2,6 dimethoxy and not drawn in the correct position of 2,5...24.78.65.103 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

...no it isn't? Testem (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

-- The structure has the methoxys at the 3 and 6 positions and should be corrected 188.250.16.227 (talk) 12:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

That's also not correct... Testem (talk) 23:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

It's really the wrong structure, please edit this 217.229.104.118 (talk) 20:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

What is the correct structure? Testem (talk) 13:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

If the chemical name given in the text for reference 1 is correct, and I see no reason why it should not be, then the structure shown in this article is correct. RaynesParkGuy (talk) 10:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)