In set theory, a supercompact cardinal is a type of large cardinal independently introduced by Solovay and Reinhardt.[1] They display a variety of reflection properties.

Formal definition edit

If   is any ordinal,   is  -supercompact means that there exists an elementary embedding   from the universe   into a transitive inner model   with critical point  ,   and

 

That is,   contains all of its  -sequences. Then   is supercompact means that it is  -supercompact for all ordinals  .

Alternatively, an uncountable cardinal   is supercompact if for every   such that   there exists a normal measure over  , in the following sense.

  is defined as follows:

 .

An ultrafilter   over   is fine if it is  -complete and  , for every  . A normal measure over   is a fine ultrafilter   over   with the additional property that every function   such that   is constant on a set in  . Here "constant on a set in  " means that there is   such that  .

Properties edit

Supercompact cardinals have reflection properties. If a cardinal with some property (say a 3-huge cardinal) that is witnessed by a structure of limited rank exists above a supercompact cardinal  , then a cardinal with that property exists below  . For example, if   is supercompact and the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH) holds below   then it holds everywhere because a bijection between the powerset of   and a cardinal at least   would be a witness of limited rank for the failure of GCH at   so it would also have to exist below  .

Finding a canonical inner model for supercompact cardinals is one of the major problems of inner model theory.

The least supercompact cardinal is the least   such that for every structure   with cardinality of the domain  , and for every   sentence   such that  , there exists a substructure   with smaller domain (i.e.  ) that satisfies  .[2]

Supercompactness has a combinatorial characterization similar to the property of being ineffable. Let   be the set of all nonempty subsets of   which have cardinality  . A cardinal   is supercompact iff for every set   (equivalently every cardinal  ), for every function  , if   for all  , then there is some   such that   is stationary.[3]

Magidor obtained a variant of the tree property which holds for an inaccessible cardinal iff it is supercompact.[4]

See also edit

References edit

  • Drake, F. R. (1974). Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics; V. 76). Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN 0-444-10535-2.
  • Jech, Thomas (2002). Set theory, third millennium edition (revised and expanded). Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.
  • Kanamori, Akihiro (2003). The Higher Infinite : Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN 3-540-00384-3.

Citations edit

  1. ^ A. Kanamori, "Kunen and set theory", pp.2450--2451. Topology and its Applications, vol. 158 (2011).
  2. ^ Magidor, M. (1971). "On the Role of Supercompact and Extendible Cardinals in Logic". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 10 (2): 147–157. doi:10.1007/BF02771565.
  3. ^ M. Magidor, Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals, pp.281--282. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 42 no. 1, 1974.
  4. ^ S. Hachtman, S. Sinapova, "The super tree property at the successor of a singular". Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol 236, iss. 1 (2020), pp.473--500.