In mathematics, the slow manifold of an equilibrium point of a dynamical system occurs as the most common example of a center manifold. One of the main methods of simplifying dynamical systems, is to reduce the dimension of the system to that of the slow manifold—center manifold theory rigorously justifies the modelling.[1][2] For example, some global and regional models of the atmosphere or oceans resolve the so-called quasi-geostrophic flow dynamics on the slow manifold of the atmosphere/oceanic dynamics,[3] and is thus crucial to forecasting with a climate model.

In some cases, a slow manifold is defined to be the invariant manifold on which the dynamics are slow compared to the dynamics off the manifold. The slow manifold in a particular problem would be a sub-manifold of either the stable, unstable, or center manifold, exclusively, that has the same dimension of, and is tangent to, the eigenspace with an associated eigenvalue (or eigenvalue pair) that has the smallest real part in magnitude. This generalizes the definition described in the first paragraph. Furthermore, one might define the slow manifold to be tangent to more than one eigenspace by choosing a cut-off point in an ordering of the real part eigenvalues in magnitude from least to greatest. In practice, one should be careful to see what definition the literature is suggesting.

Definition edit

Consider the dynamical system

 

for an evolving state vector   and with equilibrium point  . Then the linearization of the system at the equilibrium point is

 

The matrix   defines four invariant subspaces characterized by the eigenvalues   of the matrix: as described in the entry for the center manifold three of the subspaces are the stable, unstable and center subspaces corresponding to the span of the eigenvectors with eigenvalues   that have real part negative, positive, and zero, respectively; the fourth subspace is the slow subspace given by the span of the eigenvectors, and generalized eigenvectors, corresponding to the eigenvalue   precisely (more generally,[4] corresponding to all eigenvalues with   separated by a gap from all other eigenvalues, those with  ). The slow subspace is a subspace of the center subspace, or identical to it, or possibly empty.

Correspondingly, the nonlinear system has invariant manifolds, made of trajectories of the nonlinear system, corresponding to each of these invariant subspaces. There is an invariant manifold tangent to the slow subspace and with the same dimension; this manifold is the slow manifold.

Stochastic slow manifolds also exist for noisy dynamical systems (stochastic differential equation), as do also stochastic center, stable and unstable manifolds.[5] Such stochastic slow manifolds are similarly useful in modeling emergent stochastic dynamics, but there are many fascinating issues to resolve such as history and future dependent integrals of the noise.[6][7]

Examples edit

Simple case with two variables edit

The coupled system in two variables   and  

 

has the exact slow manifold   on which the evolution is  . Apart from exponentially decaying transients, this slow manifold and its evolution captures all solutions that are in the neighborhood of the origin.[8] The neighborhood of attraction is, roughly, at least the half-space  .

Slow dynamics among fast waves edit

Edward Norton Lorenz introduced the following dynamical system of five equations in five variables to explore the notion of a slow manifold of quasi-geostrophic flow[9]

 

Linearized about the origin the eigenvalue zero has multiplicity three, and there is a complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues,  . Hence there exists a three-dimensional slow manifold (surrounded by 'fast' waves in the   and   variables). Lorenz later argued a slow manifold did not exist![10] But normal form[11] arguments suggest that there is a dynamical system that is exponentially close to the Lorenz system for which there is a good slow manifold.

Eliminate an infinity of variables edit

In modeling we aim to simplify enormously. This example uses a slow manifold to simplify the 'infinite dimensional' dynamics of a partial differential equation to a model of one ordinary differential equation. Consider a field   undergoing the nonlinear diffusion

 

with Robin boundary conditions

 

Parametrising the boundary conditions by   empowers us to cover the insulating Neumann boundary condition case  , the Dirichlet boundary condition case  , and all cases between.

Now for a marvelous trick, much used in exploring dynamics with bifurcation theory. Since parameter   is constant, adjoin the trivially true differential equation

 

Then in the extended state space of the evolving field and parameter,  , there exists an infinity of equilibria, not just one equilibrium, with   (insulating) and  constant, say  . Without going into details, about each and every equilibria the linearized diffusion has two zero eigenvalues and for   all the rest are negative (less than  ). Thus the two-dimensional dynamics on the slow manifolds emerge (see emergence) from the nonlinear diffusion no matter how complicated the initial conditions.

Here one can straightforwardly verify the slow manifold to be precisely the field   where amplitude   evolves according to

 

That is, after the initial transients that by diffusion smooth internal structures, the emergent behavior is one of relatively slow decay of the amplitude ( ) at a rate controlled by the type of boundary condition (constant  ).

Notice that this slow manifold model is global in   as each equilibria is necessarily in the slow subspace of each other equilibria, but is only local in parameter  . We cannot yet be sure how large   may be taken, but the theory assures us the results do hold for some finite parameter  .

Perhaps the simplest nontrivial stochastic slow manifold edit

Stochastic modeling is much more complicated—this example illustrates just one such complication. Consider for small parameter   the two variable dynamics of this linear system forced with noise from the random walk  :

 

One could simply notice that the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process   is formally the history integral

 

and then assert that   is simply the integral of this history integral. However, this solution then inappropriately contains fast time integrals, due to the   in the integrand, in a supposedly long time model.

Alternatively, a stochastic coordinate transform extracts a sound model for the long term dynamics. Change variables to   where

 

then the new variables evolve according to the simple

 

In these new coordinates we readily deduce   exponentially quickly, leaving   undergoing a random walk to be the long term model of the stochastic dynamics on the stochastic slow manifold obtained by setting  .

A web service constructs such slow manifolds in finite dimensions, both deterministic and stochastic.[12]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ J. Carr, Applications of centre manifold theory, Applied Math. Sci. 35, 1981, Springer-Verlag
  2. ^ Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of applied bifurcation theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences 112, 1995, Springer-Verlag
  3. ^ R. Camassa, On the geometry of an atmospheric slow manifold, Physica D, 84:357–397, 1995.
  4. ^ Aulbach, B.; Wanner, T. (2000). "The Hartman–Grobman theorem for Caratheodory-type differential equations in Banach spaces". Nonlinear Analysis. 40 (1–8): 91–104. doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(00)85006-3.
  5. ^ Ludwig Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 2003.
  6. ^ A. J. Roberts, Normal form transforms separate slow and fast modes in stochastic dynamical systems, Physica A 387:12–38, 2008.
  7. ^ Ludwig Arnold and Peter Imkeller, Normal forms for stochastic differential equations, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 110:559–588, 1998.
  8. ^ A. J. Roberts, Simple examples of the derivation of amplitude equations for systems of equations possessing bifurcations, J. Austral. Math. Soc. B, 27, 48–65, 1985.
  9. ^ E. N. Lorenz, On the existence of a slow manifold, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 43:1547–1557, 1986.
  10. ^ E. Lorenz and Krishnamurty, On the non-existence of a slow manifold, J. Atmos. Sci. 44:2940–2950, 1987.
  11. ^ James Murdock, Normal forms and unfoldings for local dynamical systems, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 2003, Springer
  12. ^ A. J. Roberts, Normal form of stochastic or deterministic multiscale differential equations, http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/anthony.roberts/sdenf.html, 2009.