The merger doctrine in civil procedure stands for the proposition that when litigants agree to a settlement, and then seek to have their settlement incorporated into a court order, the court order actually extinguishes the settlement and replaces it with the authority of the court to supervise the behavior of the parties.[1] Under this doctrine, the court is free to modify its order as necessary to achieve justice in the case, and may hold a party that breaches the agreement in contempt of court.
In U.S criminal law, merger doctrine holds that if a defendant has committed acts that simultaneously meet the elements of a more serious and less serious offense, the defendant may be charged with the more serious offense and the lesser offense drops in order to avoid implicating double jeopardy.[2]
References edit
- ^ Ginsberg, Edwin M. (1992). "The Doctrine of Merger With Respect to Real Estate Transactions: Taking the Bull by the Horns". Nova Law Review. 16 (3): 37.
- ^ "Merger Doctrine". Wex. Cornell Law School. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
See also edit
 | This legal term article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |