Kramkov's optional decomposition theorem

In probability theory, Kramkov's optional decomposition theorem (or just optional decomposition theorem) is a mathematical theorem on the decomposition of a positive supermartingale with respect to a family of equivalent martingale measures into the form

where is an adapted (or optional) process.

The theorem is of particular interest for financial mathematics, where the interpretation is: is the wealth process of a trader, is the gain/loss and the consumption process.

The theorem was proven in 1994 by Russian mathematician Dmitry Kramkov.[1] The theorem is named after the Doob-Meyer decomposition but unlike there, the process is no longer predictable but only adapted (which, under the condition of the statement, is the same as dealing with an optional process).

Kramkov's optional decomposition theorem edit

Let   be a filtered probability space with the filtration satisfying the usual conditions.

A  -dimensional process   is locally bounded if there exist a sequence of stopping times   such that   almost surely if   and   for   and  .

Statement edit

Let   be  -dimensional càdlàg (or RCLL) process that is locally bounded. Let   be the space of equivalent local martingale measures for   and without loss of generality let us assume  .

Let   be a positive stochastic process then   is a  -supermartingale for each   if and only if there exist an  -integrable and predictable process   and an adapted increasing process   such that

 [2][3]

Commentary edit

The statement is still true under change of measure to an equivalent measure.

References edit

  1. ^ Kramkov, Dimitri O. (1996). "Optional decomposition of supermartingales and hedging contingent claims in incomplete security markets". Probability Theory and Related Fields. 105: 459–479. doi:10.1007/BF01191909.
  2. ^ Kramkov, Dimitri O. (1996). "Optional decomposition of supermartingales and hedging contingent claims in incomplete security markets". Probability Theory and Related Fields. 105: 461. doi:10.1007/BF01191909.
  3. ^ Delbaen, Freddy; Schachermayer, Walter (2006). The Mathematics of Arbitrage. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. p. 31.