# g-factor (physics)

For the acceleration-related quantity in mechanics, see g-force.

A g-factor (also called g value or dimensionless magnetic moment) is a dimensionless quantity which characterizes the magnetic moment and gyromagnetic ratio of a particle or nucleus. It is essentially a proportionality constant that relates the observed magnetic moment μ of a particle to the appropriate angular momentum quantum number and the appropriate fundamental quantum unit of magnetism, usually the Bohr magneton or nuclear magneton.

## Calculation

### Electron g-factors

There are three magnetic moments associated with an electron: One from its spin angular momentum, one from its orbital angular momentum, and one from its total angular momentum (the quantum-mechanical sum of those two components). Corresponding to these three moments are three different g-factors:

#### Electron spin g-factor

The most famous of these is the electron spin g-factor (more often called simply the electron g-factor), ge, defined by

$\boldsymbol{\mu}_S = \frac{g_e\mu_\mathrm{B}}{\hbar}\boldsymbol{S}$

where μS is the total magnetic moment resulting from the spin of an electron, S is its spin angular momentum, and μB is the Bohr magneton. In atomic physics, the electron spin g-factor is often defined as the absolute value or negative of ge:

$g_S = |g_e| = -g_e.$

The z-component of the magnetic moment then becomes

$\mu_z=-g_S \mu_\mathrm{B} m_s$

The value gS is roughly equal to 2.002319, and is known to extraordinary precision.[1][2] The reason it is not precisely two is explained by quantum electrodynamics calculation of the anomalous magnetic dipole moment.[3]

#### Electron orbital g-factor

Secondly, the electron orbital g-factor, gL, is defined by

$\boldsymbol{\mu}_L = -\frac{g_L \mu_\mathrm{B}}{\hbar}\boldsymbol{L}$

where μL is the total magnetic moment resulting from the orbital angular momentum of an electron, L is the magnitude of its orbital angular momentum, and μB is the Bohr magneton. The value of gL is exactly equal to one, by a quantum-mechanical argument analogous to the derivation of the classical magnetogyric ratio. For an electron in an orbital with a magnetic quantum number ml, the z-component of the orbital angular momentum is

$\mu_z=g_L \mu_\mathrm{B} m_l$

which, since gL = 1, is just μBml

#### Total angular momentum (Landé) g-factor

Thirdly, the Landé g-factor, gJ, is defined by

$\boldsymbol{\mu} = -\frac{g_J \mu_\mathrm{B} }{\hbar}\boldsymbol{J}$

where μ is the total magnetic moment resulting from both spin and orbital angular momentum of an electron, J = L+S is its total angular momentum, and μB is the Bohr magneton. The value of gJ is related to gL and gS by a quantum-mechanical argument; see the article Landé g-factor.

### Nucleon and nucleus g-factors

Protons, neutrons, and many nuclei have spin and magnetic moments, and therefore associated g-factors. The formula conventionally used is

$\boldsymbol{\mu} = \frac{g \mu_\mathrm{N}}{\hbar}\boldsymbol{I}$

where μ is the magnetic moment resulting from the nuclear spin, I is the nuclear spin angular momentum, μN is the nuclear magneton, and g is the effective g-factor.

### Muon g-factor

If supersymmetry is realized in nature, there will be corrections to g-2 of the muon due to loop diagrams involving the new particles. Amongst the leading corrections are those depicted here: a neutralino and a smuon loop, and a chargino and a muon sneutrino loop. This represents an example of "beyond the Standard-Model" physics that might contribute to g-2.

The muon, like the electron has a g-factor from its spin, given by the equation

$\mathbf{\mu} = \frac{ge}{2m_\mu}\mathbf{S}$

where μ is the magnetic moment resulting from the muon’s spin, S is the spin angular momentum, and mμ is the muon mass.

The fact that the muon g-factor is not quite the same as the electron g-factor is mostly explained by quantum electrodynamics and its calculation of the anomalous magnetic dipole moment. Almost all of the small difference between the two values (99.96% of it) is due to a well-understood lack of a heavy-particle diagrams contributing to the probability for emission of a photon representing the magnetic dipole field, which are present for muons, but not electrons, in QED theory. These are entirely a result of the mass difference between the particles.

However, not all of the difference between the g-factors for electrons and muons are exactly explained by the quantum electrodynamics Standard Model. The muon g-factor can, at least in theory, be affected by physics beyond the Standard Model, so it has been measured very precisely, in particular at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. As of November 2006, the experimentally measured value is 2.0023318416(13), compared to the theoretical prediction of 2.0023318361(10).[4] This is a difference of 3.4 standard deviations, suggesting beyond-the-Standard-Model physics may be having an effect.

↑Jump back a section

## Measured g-factor values

Particle g-factor Uncertainty
Electron $g_\mathrm{e}$ −2.00231930436153 0.00000000000053
Neutron $g_\mathrm{n}$ −3.82608545 0.00000090
Proton $g_\mathrm{p}$ 5.585694713 0.000000046
Muon $g_{\mu}$ −2.0023318414 0.0000000012
Currently accepted NIST g-factor values [5]

The electron g-factor is one of the most precisely measured values in physics, with a relative standard uncertainty of 2.6 x 10-13.

↑Jump back a section

## Notes and references

1. ^ Gabrielse, Gerald; Hanneke, David (October 2006). "Precision pins down the electron's magnetism". CERN Courier 46 (8): 35–37.
2. ^ Odom, B.; Hanneke, D.; d’Urso, B.; Gabrielse, G. (2006). "New measurement of the electron magnetic moment using a one-electron quantum cyclotron". Physical Review Letters 97 (3): 030801. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..97c0801O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.030801. PMID 16907490.
3. ^ Brodsky, S; Franke, V; Hiller, J; McCartor, G; Paston, S; Prokhvatilov, E (2004). "A nonperturbative calculation of the electron's magnetic moment". Nuclear Physics B 703 (1–2): 333–362. arXiv:hep-ph/0406325. Bibcode:2004NuPhB.703..333B. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.10.027.
4. ^ Hagiwara, K.; Martin,, A. D.; Nomura, Daisuke; Teubner, T. (2006). "Improved predictions for g-2 of the muon and alpha(QED)(M(Z)**2)". Physics Letters B 649 (2–3): 173–179. arXiv:hep-ph/0611102. Bibcode:2007PhLB..649..173H. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.04.012.
5. ^
↑Jump back a section