| Submission declined on 17 February 2024 by Tutwakhamoe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 26 December 2023 by Relativity (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Relativity 4 months ago. | |
Comment: The article itself did not make it clear as to why the subject is notable. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sentences like "Performance and Scalability: Written in C++, Ultipa Graph is optimized for performance and scalability, catering to applications with large datasets and demanding processing requirements" read like advertisements, and should be reworded. Relativity 04:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 | |
| Developer(s) | Ultipa, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Stable release | 4.3
/ 2023 |
| Written in | C++ |
| Type | Graph database |
| License | Proprietary commercial software |
| Website | www |
Ultipa Graph is a property graph database developed by Ultipa, Inc..[1]. Ultipa Graph is categorized as a Hybrid Transactional/Analytical Processing (HTAP)[2][3]
Ultipa, Inc. edit
Ultipa Graph is developed by Ultipa, Inc., based in San Ramon, California. Ultipa, Inc. is member of the Linked Data Benchmark Council (LDBC), a non-profit organization aiming to define standard graph benchmarks to foster a community around graph processing technologies[4], and to investigate research questions on graph query languages and language extensions for graphs, including the Graph Query Language[5]
References edit
- ^ "Company profile for: Ultipa on Bloor Research". Bloor Research. 2023-10-20. Retrieved 2023-12-23.
- ^ Sun, Ricky (2023). "Scalability design in a graph database without losing performance". The Knowledge Graph Conference 2023. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7827268.
- ^ Sun, Ricky; Chen, Jamie (2023-06-18). "Design of Highly Scalable Graph Database Systems without Exponential Performance Degradation". Proceedings of the International Workshop on Big Data in Emergent Distributed Environments. BiDEDE '23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1145/3579142.3594293. ISBN 979-8-4007-0093-4. S2CID 258844830.
- ^ "Announcing the LDBC Financial Benchmark Task Force". ldbcouncil.org. Retrieved 2023-12-24.
- ^ "LDBC Graph Query Working Groups". ldbcouncil.org. Retrieved 2023-12-24.
External Links edit
This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories: