Submission declined on 12 December 2023 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 7 August 2023 by AngusWOOF (talk). We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer. Declined by AngusWOOF 9 months ago. | |
Rush E is a piece of music composed for piano by YouTube creator Sheet Music Boss. Written in the key of E minor, the piece was developed to be intentionally difficult, if not impossible, to be played by a single human pianist.[1] The song was developed as an extension of the "E" internet meme, itself a derivative of the "Lord Marquaad" meme in which the face of YouTube creator Markiplier is superimposed over the body of Shrek character Lord Farquaad.[2]
Composition edit
The piece is noted to have Russian classical music influences. It consists of over 30,000 individual notes, as well of hundreds of chords including upward of 30 different individual notes. A vocal overlay with a deep-echoed "E" can be observed partly through the first half of the piece.
References edit
- ^ Kelly, M. J. (2023-07-25). "The Story Behind Rush E". Medium. Retrieved 2023-12-12.
- ^ Lee, Shirley (3 August 2021). "The Latest YouTube Feud Is Getting Pianists Millions of Views". Medium. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.