Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by GMH Melbourne (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Try to aim for 3-4 sources that meet the WP:NCORP criteria. GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
| NUCLEAR FOR AUSTRALIA LTD | |
| Company type | Private |
| Founded | December 2022 |
| Founder | Will Shackel |
| Headquarters | , |
| Website | nuclearforaustralia |
Nuclear for Australia is a youth-led campaign seeking a transition to nuclear energy in Australia, founded by Will Shackel.[1]
The organisation initiated its public presence by using paid Facebook advertising to promote videos and a survey to it's audience. Soon after it launched a change.org petition calling on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen to legalise nuclear energy.[2] The petition has gained nearly 20,000 signatures.[3]
In May 2023, Shackel appeared solo in front of an Australian Senate Committee in Canberra to present his submission on why he believed nuclear energy should be legalised.[4]
References edit
- ^ "About Nuclear for Australia". Nuclear for Australia. Retrieved 2024-03-06.
- ^ Wilson, Cam (2023-11-08). "Teen poster boy for nuclear energy denies Libs are backing his 'nonpartisan' group". Crikey. Retrieved 2024-03-06.
- ^ "Sign Today: Legalise Nuclear Energy". Nuclear for Australia. Retrieved 2024-03-06.
- ^ Shackel, Will. "Submission 15 Nuclear for Australia". Retrieved 2024-03-06.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.