| Submission declined on 28 March 2024 by Vrxces (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 27 March 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 58 days ago.
| |
Comment: As already rejected, this service lacks reliable secondary coverage to substantiate its notability. Please see WP:GNG for guidance. Without this secondary coverage, the page reads like a promotional page. Happy to discuss on my talk page if you have any questions or need help. Without revisions, this page is unlikely to be accepted. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Eklipse.gg is an AI-driven highlight creator for gamers and content creators, streamlining the transformation and customization of Twitch clips for platforms like TikTok, Reels, and YouTube Shorts.[1]
History edit
Eklipse.gg first founded in 2019 with the name Eklip.se, but it was changed into Eklipse.gg in 2022.
Eklipse.gg utilizes artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically generate highlight clips from Twitch, YouTube, Facebook, and Kick streams, as well as YouTube and Facebook gaming videos.[2] It captures everything from gaming highlights to hilarious in-game moments which can be quickly converted into TikTok/Reels/YouTube shorts.
Eklipse AI optimizes Object Detection and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology to analyze streams and extract the most epic moments, from which users can create viral VODs to promote their channel.[3]
About edit
The core functionality of Eklipse.gg revolves around its AI Highlight Generation technology. This feature automatically processes video streams to detect and compile moments of interest without the need for manual selection or editing by the user.[4]
References edit
- ^ "Eklipse.GG Reviews: Details, Pricing, Core features, Use cases, Eklipse.GG alternatives | Toolify". www.toolify.ai. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
- ^ "AI Gaming Highlight Clipper - Eklipse". dang.ai. Retrieved 2024-03-28.
- ^ "Eklipse: AI Highlight Generator for Streamers & Gamers". Deepgram. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
- ^ "Eklipse AI Review, Features, Price, Use Cases & FAQs". What's The Big Data?. Retrieved 2024-03-28.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.