 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,991 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 21 May 2024 by CSMention269 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 5 May 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability. Declined by DoubleGrazing 25 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 31 March 2024 by The Herald (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by The Herald 60 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 March 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago.
| |
Comment: Kindly address the issues. You are close to get this draft rejected. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 05:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Comedy verite or Comedy vérité is a television format that presents fictional Comedy series in the staged form of a Docusoap.[1] This is a technical term from the field of Television studies, introduced in order to be able to make more precise distinctions and differentiations between evening-filling mockumentary-films and 'mockumentary series' with an average episode length of 30 minutes. While mockumentary films play with the idea that what is shown could be true, mockumentary-series or Comedy Verite leave no doubt about their own fictionality.
Stylistic Features edit
Humorous situations and characters are presented as if they were spontaneous and real observations of everyday life at first sight. This means that there is usually a high use of emphasized hand-held camera, emphasized because the recordings are interspersed with Pannings, Whip zooms and 'tracked' Autofocus, as well as occasional covert filming. These alternate with interview-scenes in the style of Talking Heads, as we know them from Television´s pundits.
This way Comedy Verite refers to a series with episodes of up to half an hour in length that combines to the specifications of a classic Sitcom in terms of narration and character constellation, but on a formal level gives the impression that it is a Docusoap. In Comedy verite, the clichés and stereotypes of classic Sitcoms are parodied[2]
Word origin (etymology) edit
The term Comedy Verite is a compound word of comedy and vérité (French for "truth") to emphasize the fusion of Situation comedy with Cinema vérité. Cinema vérité stands for a French documentary style of the 1950s and 60s in which the filmmaker constantly intervenes in the filming process and thus stands for stylized productions, interactions between filmmaker and subject, and even moments of deliberate provocation. Television scientist Brett Mills coined this term in 2004 based on an analysis of the series The Office.
Examples edit
In addition to The Office other well-known examples of this include series such as Modern Family, Parks and Recreation, Arrested Development, What We Do in the Shadows and Abbott Elementary.
Further Reading edit
- Mills, Brett: „Comedy verite: contemporary sitcom form”, Screen, Volume 45, Issue 1, Spring 2004: pp. 63–78.
- Thompson, Ethan: „Comedy Verité? The Observational Documentary Meets the Televisual Sitcom”, The Velvet Light Trap, No. 60, Fall 2007: pp. 63–72.
References edit
- ^ Mills, Brett: „Comedy verite: contemporary sitcom form” Screen, Volume 45, Issue 1, Spring 2004: pp. 63–78, p. 65
- ^ Mills, Brett: „Comedy verite: contemporary sitcom form” Screen, Volume 45, Issue 1, Spring 2004: pp. 63–78, p. 78
External links edit
- Dunleavy, Trisha: „Hybridity in TV Sitcom: The Case of Comedy Verité”, Flow Journal, December, 11 2008
- Madison, David: „Comedy Vérité: Arrested Development and the Docusoap Form”, Forbes & Fifth 3, 2013: pp. 83–92.