Category talk:Redirects from alternative names

Redirect Category‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

"do not replace" edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've made the language about not replacing the redirect with a piped link more absolute. As far as I can see there's no good reason to do that, ever. In some cases there may be a subtle distinction between the two names, and eventually there might even be a separate article where there's currently a redirect. In that case, it's better if the link points to the new, separate article. --Trovatore 18:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

alternate edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Alternate" means taking turns; "alternative" means different possibilities. I have moved the category to Category:Redirects from alternative names. Snottygobble 04:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What am I doing wrong? I inserted {{R from San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA MSA}}. Also with several other variations I could dream up. The template choked, so I realize this isn't right, but what is? Thanks. Student7 (talk) 01:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic