Category talk:Radio frequency antenna types

Radio Category‑class High‑importance

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Category

This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

High

This category has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

This category was nominated for deletion on 14 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

frequency range vs no of arrays

BiLogs edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

BoLogs are very common antennas in the world of Test and Measurement, I'm curious why there is no mention of them here, or indeed anywhere else on Wikipedia. To be honest I could probably start an article myself but I thought I'd post here to see if anyone was interested or if the topic was covered elsewhere.

A quick Google reveals their existence

Obliteratu (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spider Web Type edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This type was not listed. A google image search: https://www.google.ca/search?q=spider+web+coil&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&safe=images&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=4YF8T7ncFenf0QHaj_2TDA&biw=1280&bih=832&sei=7IF8T-nxFOif0AH4qbnyCw

(Sorry for the ugly editing...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.136.242.1 (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic