This category is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Would it be better if the definition of words and phrases were left to wiktionary? For example the definition of ad hoc is in wiktionary and wikipedia. Obviously if a phrase has useful history or has been newsworthy this may need more of a wikipedia style discussion but a lot of these phrases are just included in wikipedia for their basic definition. -- Ashley VH 09:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The prior poster brings up a good point. All of these definitions link back to Wikipedia? Can I just add new phrases and link to Wiktionary? Efesar (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
