This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This category does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Additional information:
/
This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a bit of a problem with this category in that it also seems to seek to document ongoing unit deployments. The problem is that aside from implications of national security of the United States there are also ongoing reorganizations and reflaging of units which would need to be maintained, and it seems Wikipedia is not the appropriate resource for this information. --Mrg3105 22:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
In the first place, ongoing deployments are part of the Lineage of a unit, and are correctly included in the specific unit history. In addition, those deployments are part of the Order Of Battle of a conflict, and again are so included. The primary problem with this category is that it is too all-inclusive, and it isn't specific enough. This can be taken care of by creating lower level sub-categories, and I'll get that started. - SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) (talk)
