Category talk:Articles with peacock terms
Latest comment: 8 years ago by LookingGlass in topic Positive and negative?
Positive and negative? edit
Here, peacock terms is used for text that claims some enhanced positive quality while not substantiating the claim. Isn't it also needed for the reverse, when an editor claims an enhanced negative quality withought substantiating the claim. For instance writing that:
This is the most controversial part of the methodology
without substantiation. Or is there a corresponding tag for these situations? LookingGlass (talk) 10:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)