This category is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This category is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the category attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Isaac Newton, Otto von Guericke, Christiaan Huygens, Evangelista Torricelli, Galileo Galilei. Skamnelis (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Those aren't necessarily omissions: have you checked whether these articles aren't already correctly classified in more specific subcategories of this one? For instance, Christiaan Huygens is in Category:17th-century astronomers, which is a direct subcategory of this one. I assume it will be similar with the others. In such cases, as a rule, we don't duplicate the more specific categorization with the redundant more general one. Fut.Perf.☼ 17:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
