Bombieri–Lang conjecture

In arithmetic geometry, the Bombieri–Lang conjecture is an unsolved problem conjectured by Enrico Bombieri and Serge Lang about the Zariski density of the set of rational points of an algebraic variety of general type.

Statement edit

The weak Bombieri–Lang conjecture for surfaces states that if   is a smooth surface of general type defined over a number field  , then the  -rational points of   do not form a dense set in the Zariski topology on  .[1]

The general form of the Bombieri–Lang conjecture states that if   is a positive-dimensional algebraic variety of general type defined over a number field  , then the  -rational points of   do not form a dense set in the Zariski topology.[2][3][4]

The refined form of the Bombieri–Lang conjecture states that if   is an algebraic variety of general type defined over a number field  , then there is a dense open subset   of   such that for all number field extensions   over  , the set of  -rational points in   is finite.[4]

History edit

The Bombieri–Lang conjecture was independently posed by Enrico Bombieri and Serge Lang. In a 1980 lecture at the University of Chicago, Enrico Bombieri posed a problem about the degeneracy of rational points for surfaces of general type.[1] Independently in a series of papers starting in 1971, Serge Lang conjectured a more general relation between the distribution of rational points and algebraic hyperbolicity,[1][5][6][7] formulated in the "refined form" of the Bombieri–Lang conjecture.[4]

Generalizations and implications edit

The Bombieri–Lang conjecture is an analogue for surfaces of Faltings's theorem, which states that algebraic curves of genus greater than one only have finitely many rational points.[8]

If true, the Bombieri–Lang conjecture would resolve the Erdős–Ulam problem, as it would imply that there do not exist dense subsets of the Euclidean plane all of whose pairwise distances are rational.[8][9]

In 1997, Lucia Caporaso, Barry Mazur, Joe Harris, and Patricia Pacelli showed that the Bombieri–Lang conjecture implies a uniform boundedness conjecture for rational points: there is a constant   depending only on   and   such that the number of rational points of any genus   curve   over any degree   number field is at most  .[2][3]

References edit

  1. ^ a b c Das, Pranabesh; Turchet, Amos (2015), "Invitation to integral and rational points on curves and surfaces", in Gasbarri, Carlo; Lu, Steven; Roth, Mike; Tschinkel, Yuri (eds.), Rational Points, Rational Curves, and Entire Holomorphic Curves on Projective Varieties, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 654, American Mathematical Society, pp. 53–73, arXiv:1407.7750
  2. ^ a b Poonen, Bjorn (2012), Uniform boundedness of rational points and preperiodic points, arXiv:1206.7104
  3. ^ a b Conceição, Ricardo; Ulmer, Douglas; Voloch, José Felipe (2012), "Unboundedness of the number of rational points on curves over function fields", New York Journal of Mathematics, 18: 291–293
  4. ^ a b c Hindry, Marc; Silverman, Joseph H. (2000), "F.5.2. The Bombieri–Lang Conjecture", Diophantine Geometry: An Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 201, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 479–482, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1210-2, ISBN 0-387-98975-7, MR 1745599
  5. ^ Lang, Serge (1971), "Transcendental numbers and diophantine approximations", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 635–678, doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1971-12761-1, ISSN 0002-9904
  6. ^ Lang, Serge (1974), "Higher dimensional diophantine problems", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 779–788, doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1974-13516-0, ISSN 0002-9904
  7. ^ Lang, Serge (1983), Fundamentals of Diophantine geometry, New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 224, ISBN 0-387-90837-4
  8. ^ a b Tao, Terence (December 20, 2014), "The Erdos-Ulam problem, varieties of general type, and the Bombieri-Lang conjecture", What's new
  9. ^ Shaffaf, Jafar (May 2018), "A solution of the Erdős–Ulam problem on rational distance sets assuming the Bombieri–Lang conjecture", Discrete & Computational Geometry, 60 (8), arXiv:1501.00159, doi:10.1007/s00454-018-0003-3