| Type |
Case |
Citation |
Issues |
Joined by |
Other opinions |
| 4-01
|
Allen v. Lawhorn • [full text] |
01562 U.S. ___ (2010)
|
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act • Sixth Amendment • ineffective assistance of counsel |
Thomas, Alito |
|
| Scalia dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari, where the Eleventh Circuit had set aside a death sentence because the defense attorney did not give a closing argument at sentencing. Scalia believed the Eleventh Circuit failed to properly find that the omission of a closing argument was prejudicial and failed to comply with AEDPA by giving the necessary deference to the state court's judgment. In conclusion, Scalia wrote that "I would not dissent from denial of certiorari if what happened here were an isolated judicial error. It is not. With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress's command [under AEDPA]...We invite continued lawlessness when we permit a patently improper interference with state justice such as that which occurred in this case to stand." |
| 4-02
|
Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A. • [full text] |
02562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
Chapter 13 • Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 • means test |
|
|
| Scalia dissented from the Court's opinion holding that a car ownership cost income exemption for Chapter 13 debtors was only available to car owners who made lease or loan payments. The relevant bankruptcy provision incorporated certain cost tables prepared by the IRS as part of the Chapter 13 means test for determining how much income debtors had available to repay creditors. Scalia believed that the statutory phrase "applicable monthly expense amounts" simply directed courts, in this instance, to look at the table column corresponding to how many cars the debtor owned, not to examine whether the debtor actually had real costs of that kind. He also disagreed with the Court's use, in aid of its interpretation, of IRS materials that were supplemental to the tables because the bankruptcy statutes did not incorporate or reference those materials in any way. |
| 2-03
|
NASA v. Nelson |
03562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
informational privacy |
Thomas |
|
|
| 1-04
|
Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP |
04562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor |
|
|
| 1-05
|
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC |
05562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito |
|
|
| 4-06
|
Michigan v. Bryant |
06562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-07
|
Staub v. Proctor Hospital |
07562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
|
|
| 2-08
|
Wall v. Kholi |
08562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 4-09
|
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. |
09562 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Thomas (in part) |
|
|
| 2-10
|
Connick v. Thompson |
10563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Alito |
|
|
| 2-11
|
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn |
11563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
First Amendment • Establishment Clause • taxpayer standing |
Thomas |
|
|
| 1-12
|
Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart |
12563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
Eleventh Amendment |
Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
|
|
| 1-13
|
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion |
13563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
Federal Arbitration Act • federal preemption • class actions |
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito |
|
|
| 4-14
|
Montana v. Wyoming |
14563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 2-15
|
CIGNA Corp. v. Amara |
15563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Thomas |
|
|
| 1-16
|
General Dynamics Corp. v. United States |
16563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
| 4-17
|
Brown v. Plata |
17563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Thomas |
|
|
| 2-18
|
United States v. Tinklenberg |
18563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Thomas |
|
|
| 2-19
|
Fowler v. United States |
19563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 2-20
|
Camreta v. Greene |
20563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-21
|
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd |
21563 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito |
|
|
| 4-22
|
Sykes v. United States |
22564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 2-23
|
Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. |
23564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 2-24
|
DePierre v. United States |
24564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-25
|
Nevada Comm’n on Ethics v. Carrigan |
25564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |
|
|
| 1-26
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes |
26564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito; Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (in part) |
|
|
| 3-27
|
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri |
27564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-28
|
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn. |
28564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan |
|
|
| 4-29
|
Derby v. United States |
29564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
Armed Career Criminal Act |
|
|
| Scalia dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari in four cases involving the "residual provision" of the Armed Career Criminal Act. |
| 4-30
|
Beer v. United States |
30564 U.S. ___ (2011)
|
|
|
|
| Scalia dissented from the Court's grant of certiorari, vacatur of the lower court's judgment, and remand. Scalia noted that he would grant cert. and instead set the case for argument. |
|
|
|
|
|