Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/June 16

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Schwede66 in topic Confusion
Today's featured article for June 16, 2024
Compton Mackenzie
Compton Mackenzie

Whisky Galore! is a British comedy film produced by Ealing Studios and released on 16 June 1949, starring Basil Radford, Bruce Seton, Joan Greenwood and Gordon Jackson. The directorial debut of Alexander Mackendrick, it was based on the 1947 novel Whisky Galore by Compton Mackenzie (pictured), and written by Mackenzie and Angus MacPhail. Inspired by the 1941 wreck of the SS Politician, the story concerns a shipwreck off a fictional Scottish island. The islanders, who have run out of whisky because of wartime rationing, salvage cases of it from the ship, against the opposition of the local Customs and Excise men. Like other Ealing comedies, Whisky Galore! explores the actions of a small group facing and overcoming a more powerful opponent. The film was well received on release; renamed Tight Little Island, it became the first film from the studios to achieve box office success in the US. It was followed by Rockets Galore!, a sequel. A remake was released in 2016. (Full article...)

Recently featured:
Picture of the day for June 16, 2024

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

"Opened fire on schoolchildren" should point to Soweto riots, not just one victim. Night Gyr 23:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your suggestion. I've changed the link accordingly. --PFHLai 16:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

2012 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 09:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

2013 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 07:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

2014 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 11:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

2015 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 18:41, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

2016 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 06:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

2017 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 08:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

2018 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 06:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fix Nara river link edit

The link to Nara river in Gujarat incorrectly points to the Nara canal in Pakistan. It should point to Nara River (India).--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done. howcheng {chat} 00:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

2019 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 00:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

2020 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 00:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

What, no mention of Bloomsday? edit

I was trying to remember why June 16 rang a bell, but it was only after giving up on WP that Bloomsday finally came to me. This is (or used to be pre-sequester) a big deal in bookstore towns like Berkeley. Sparafucil (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Sparafucil: There are two maintenance tags on that article, and per the rules, it could not be included. howcheng {chat} 02:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Next year, I hope; I tryed fixing some bare links. There doesn't seem to be a category for " 'yellow'-level or more severe article issue tags". Does replacing {{more citations needed section}} with a few {{fact}} tags change the temperature any? Sparafucil (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Sparafucil: It depends. The point of the rules are to make sure we are featuring articles of good quality, so if you're trying to game the system by saying "Oh there are no more yellow-level tags on it" then that's not gonna fly (the rules do state that a large number of {{fact}} tags relative to article length can also disqualify it). But if you can source some of that content and leave {{fact}} for where you can't, then that might be good enough, especially if the things that need citations aren't really that important anyway (in which case, why not just delete them). Hope that helps. howcheng {chat} 06:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Of course. The page doesn't seem very active, but there's a year to see if anyone takes up a Talk: suggestion, and if the cruft doesn't get footnoted in the meantime I'll zap it next spring. Sparafucil (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

2021 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 02:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Confusion edit

  • 1407 – Ming Chinese forces captured Hồ Quý Ly and his sons, conquering Đại Ngu and ending the Vietnamese Hồ dynasty. At first I had difficulties understanding what this actually means. It didn't help that initially, I thought that "Hồ Quý Ly" was a city. But once identified as a person (i.e. the father of said sons), the next confusing thing is that the tense swaps at the comma. I'm not a native English speaker; maybe somebody with a stronger command of the language than me could take a look whether this should say "conquered" and "ended" instead. Schwede66 03:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • @Schwede66: I rewrote this to say "Ming Chinese forces conquered Đại Ngu, capturing Hồ Quý Ly and his sons in the process, and ending the Vietnamese Hồ dynasty", which I think should be clearer. The tense change in the second part of the sentence is pretty standard in English: it indicates that those things happened as a result of the first part. howcheng {chat} 16:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
      Awesome. Thanks. Schwede66 17:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

2022 notes edit