"The avalanche was down,
the hillside swept bare behind it;
the last echoes died on the white slopes;
the new mount glittered and lay still in the silent valley."
Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited
Archives:
Talk, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, list

Disruptive Edits edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-Brahminism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

LΞVIXIUS💬 16:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Doug Weller: action? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bish page blocked. Doug Weller talk 18:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wow Doug. I'm disappointed. LΞVIXIUS💬 18:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Referencing style edit

Could you please be more careful with the referencing? The article used sfn exclusively, and you keep adding sfnp references. And did you move a listed ref back into the article, or was that Forman? Skyerise (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, I cannot find any evidence that Het Atman Project published by Sevire even exists. Please provide the ISBN, OCLC, or a link to establish what book you are citing. Skyerise (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Skyerise: sfnp seems to have become the preferred format. What do you mean with "listed ref"? Inline ref? And no, I didn't put that back inline, come on. "Het Atman Project" is lying besides me at the table; isbn 90-6325-419-9. The English original of course is fine too, but I have the Dutch translation, which was the quickest way to source the statements.Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please make sure you include the isbn and language parameters in the citation, then. Skyerise (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, sfnp may be preferred for new articles, but WP:REFVAR says that if an article has an established style, it should not be changed. Skyerise (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

dasrajna war edit

(TPS: Battle of the Ten Kings)

dont use your headcanon or assumption in wikipedia , 10 kings don't have any background detail

i will look into proof if you got any factual detail on kings background from original source


so remove assumptions edits Simmorta (talk) 07:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I look into detail, some of them are sure Indo-Aryan but not all such as
Alina
Anu
Āyu
Ambaśṭha
Bhageratha
Bhalanas etc
so don't put your assumption unless u think wikipedia is for joke
kindly remove them, also casualties, there is clear detail of casualties....
don't add your fiction. Simmorta (talk) 08:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your recent messages edit

A user recently posted about WP:GAME and you decided to jump in the convo despite our conversation a while back regarding assuming good faith, afterwards I pointed out you did’t follow WP:GF back when you falsely accused me of being a sockpuppet for a discussion me and Avantaputra7 have been solving and started to peruse my edits ever since… Please assume good faith and refrain from making serial messages on my talk page like this or this since this behavior is starting to resemble WP:HOUND. (Discopleasant (talk) 06:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC))Reply

@Discopleasant: do some self-reflection, and understand why your behaviour looks suspicious. Making incremental edits of one bite to your sandbox over multiple periods of time is not what our policies regard as a constructive contribution to building an encyclopedia. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I can respect that. (Discopleasant (talk) 06:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC))Reply
@Discopleasant: as an advice: disclose your previous account at your userpage, and store your removed talkpage-messages at an archive, instead of simply deleting them. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Can you show me how to do that? Idk how to archive previous messages. (Discopleasant (talk) 09:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC))Reply

Question edit

Hi Joshua, I wanted to start a new talk for this topic. I’ve been working on this in order to turn it into an article. I’ve been meaning to make it look as impartial as possible and use reliable sources, mostly I believe the problem lies on how it’s presented. And knowing you’re an autopatrolled I also want your opinion on the draft… (Discopleasant (talk) 22:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC))Reply