Please add items to the bottom of this page. I will normally reply on this page to any conversation started here.

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins edit

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pepeha edit

Hi G,

I've just created a stub for the Māori concept of pepeha. Could you have a look to make sure I haven't made too many stuff-ups on it please? :) Grutness...wha? 12:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

That looks good. I particularly appreciate the "Use by non-Māori" section where the ref is likely to be useful to us pākehā.-Gadfium (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Cheers Grutness...wha? 04:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguator for Gordonton, New Zealand edit

Hi Gadfium. A few years back you merged Gordonton into Gordonton, New Zealand. I'm wondering whether we need the disambiguator or whether we could move the article to Gordonton. Was there any partic reason you kept the disambiguator? ta, Nurg (talk) 01:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Nurg: I suspect it was because the standard practice at the time was to keep the older title. I have no problem with moving it to the simpler name. If you concur that this is an uncontroversial move, I'll just go ahead and do it.-Gadfium (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I concur. Go ahead, and thanks for volunteering. Nurg (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done.-Gadfium (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Nurg (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Scorpions1325's vote edit

Hi Gadfium... Noticed you altered their vote and it now looks like they never voted in the current RfA. You could've discussed your concerns on their talk page without changing their vote. I've seen a vote like that before and think they meant it as a joke. This is just my honest opinion. But let me ping them here ~Scorpions1325 in case I'm wrong. Regards, Volten001 05:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I did post to their talk page. Maybe they were joking, maybe they meant to type support, maybe they meant to put it in the oppose section. They have plenty of time to come back and clarify what they meant before the RfA finishes.-Gadfium (talk) 05:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your response. Since a bureaucrat has already reinstated the !vote, let's just leave it there. If the editor meant something else then they will respond and edit their !vote. Regards, Volten001 06:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024 edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Graham Beards
 

  Bureaucrat changes

 
 

  Oversight changes

  Dreamy Jazz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply