Template talk:CC0
Can I find a version of this that does not use any templates and only uses wiki text? Alphaslucas talk 09:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
What does the exact HTML look like that needs to be used in order to add the tag, i.e. <, > / ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdelaideEldridge (talk • contribs) 05:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Requested move 21 March 2019 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
– Reason: The name of the license is "CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication".[1]
The following pages currently redirect to Template:Cc-zero.
I propose making them all redirect to Template:CC0
I further propose creating the following redirects:
- Template:CC0 1.0 to Template:CC0
- Template:CC-O to Template:CC0
- Template:Cc-o to Template:CC0
- Template:CCO to Template:CC0
- Template:Cco to Template:CC0
-- Guy Macon (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I don't see a reason why not. Is there some technical reason why lots of old templates have such clunky names? Daß Wölf 19:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Creative Commons refer to the license as "CC0", not "CC-0" or "CC-Zero". Jean (t·c) 17:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Only use on file pages? edit
With data now being hosted on Wikipedia, this template should be edited to remove/alter the notice to only use on file pages, right? ɱ (talk) 03:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 16 May 2021 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change <span class="licensetpl_link_req" style="display:none;">true</span>
to <span class="licensetpl_link_req" style="display:none;">false</span>
, identifying the license is not required when reusing a CC0 image. Dylsss(talk contribs) 01:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 14:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 17 May 2021 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've noticed the license metadata link is broken, please update from the sandbox. Dylsss(talk contribs) 23:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 3 June 2024 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Shouldn't the "his or her" part just say "their"? AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think "his or her" is perfectly correct in this context — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- That text does not live in this template. See MediaWiki talk:Wm-license-cc-zero-explanation, where the original "their" was changed to "his or her". "Their" would be more inclusive of non-binary people and non-individual creators such as organizations and groups, so it would probably be a useful change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- And not only that but the same template in Commons also just uses their instead of his or her. AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 22:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- That text does not live in this template. See MediaWiki talk:Wm-license-cc-zero-explanation, where the original "their" was changed to "his or her". "Their" would be more inclusive of non-binary people and non-individual creators such as organizations and groups, so it would probably be a useful change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)