Talk:Sakhalin–Khabarovsk–Vladivostok pipeline
 | A news item involving Sakhalin–Khabarovsk–Vladivostok pipeline was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 August 2009. |  |
| A news item involving Sakhalin–Khabarovsk–Vladivostok pipeline was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 September 2011. | |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Russia may be able to help! |
Future date edit
The infobox says that this pipeline is established in 2011. This is the estimated date of the pipeline's opening, not the commencement of construction. Having a future date in this field seems wrong, although the reader should know the current year. The template for pipeline infoboxes gives no guidance on estimating future dates. I propose adding "estimated" to the est field. LeeColleton (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Because the infobox template has autocategorization function categorizing pages into establishment series categories according to the year on this field, this could be only four-digit year number. If somebody could fix the template, I agree with adding 'estimated' to the future dates. Beagel (talk) 18:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Map? edit
Does anyone have a map of the route. It would be a nice fit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.184.3 (talk) 23:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- agreed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.107.62 (talk) 22:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
It appears that such a map can be found at http://gazprom.ru/production/projects/pipelines/shvg/ For map in English, use the 'EN" link at top of that page. Toddcs (talk) 18:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Section Length edit
How long is the first section that was just opened? --86.129.253.188 (talk) 22:11, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Environmental issues and impact edit
Is there any study done at all on this, any publicity that highlighted the same, very bland publicity piece otherwise121.99.108.78 (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)