Talk:Ram Mandir
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ram Mandir article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Ram Mandir. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Ram Mandir at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
A news item involving Ram Mandir was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on the following dates: |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Bibliography edit
- Bakker, Hans T. (1984). Ayodhya, Part I: The History of Ayodhya from the 7th century BC to the middle of the 18th century. Institute of Indian Studies, University of Groningen. OCLC 769116023.
- Jain, Meenakshi (2013), Rama and Ayodhya, New Delhi: Aryan Books, ISBN 978-8173054518
- Jain, Meenakshi (2017), The Battle for Rama, New Delhi: Aryan Books, ISBN 978-81-7305-579-9
- Kunal, Kishore (2016), Ayodhya Revisited, Prabhat Prakashan, pp. 335–, ISBN 978-81-8430-357-5
- Layton, R.; Thomas, P. (2003). "Introduction". In Layton, R.; Stone, P.; Thomas, J. (eds.). Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property. Routledge. pp. 1–21. ISBN 978-1-134-60497-5.
- Srivastava, Sushil (1991), The Disputed Mosque: A Historical Inquiry, Vistaar Publications, ISBN 978-81-7036-212-8 – via archive.org
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 May 2024 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Dew1609 (talk) 10:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
The history is half cooked and information missing on the Sri Ram temple. There was a proof of existance of temple 500 years back. but teh history start as Bari masjid demolotion will create unnecessory conroversy and will deep rooted eneymity betwen community. for the good sense and huminy in consideration appreciate if the demolition part removed.
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Request to replace Hinglish with ISO 15919 edit
According to Wikipedia:Indic transliteration, the Hindi text that has to be transliterated to Latin alphabet has to be done in ISO 15919 and not Hinglish. Since the page has extended protection and I am not eligible to edit it yet, I request someone who has the privelege to make the following changes (left ones are the current ones, right ones are the ones that should be implemented):
- Mandir wahi banayenge - Maṁdira vahīṁ banāēm̐gē
- Saugandh Ram ki Khat-e hain; Hum Mandir Wahin Banayegein - Saugaṁdha Rāma kī khātē haiṁ, hama maṁdira vahīṁ banāēm̐gē
- Jaha Ram Ka Janma Hua Tha, Hum Mandir Wahi Banayenge - Jahām̐ Rāma kā janma huā thā, hama maṁdira vahīṁ banāēm̐gē
- Ram Lalla Hum Aayenge; Mandir Wahi Banayenge - Rāmā lallā hama āēm̐gē, maṁdira vahīṁ banāēm̐gē
- Pehle mandir, fir sarkaar - pahalē maṁdira, phira sarakāra
- singhdwar - siṁhadvāra
- Shilanyas - Śilānyāsa
- bhumi pujan - bhūmi pūjana
- prana pratishtha - prāṇa pratiṣṭhā
- murtis - mūrtis
- Ramarchan Puja - Rāmacaraṇa pūjā
Pur 0 0 (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't believe these phrases were "transliterations" of Hindi text. They were written as spelt in the English language sources. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- But still, we should change them. The sources don't follow Wikipedia's guidelines, but we have to because, well, we are on Wikipedia. Same reason why we change Devanagari sources to ISO 15919. Just copy paste the changes I have marked here. Pur 0 0 (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indian English transliterates these as they are. Wikipedia:USEENGLISH applies here. IAST or ISO is not required Redtigerxyz Talk 11:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excerpt from the Wikipedia:USEENGLISH article:
- Names not originally in a Latin alphabet, as with Greek, Chinese, or Russian, must be transliterated into characters generally intelligible to literate speakers of English. Established systematic transliterations (e.g., Hanyu Pinyin and IAST) are preferred. Nonetheless, if there is a common English form of the name, this is preferred over a systematically transliterated name; thus, use Tchaikovsky or Chiang Kai-shek, even though those are unsystematic. For a list of transliteration conventions by language, see Wikipedia:Romanization and Category:Wikipedia Manual of Style (regional)
- So 1-5 will still be transliterated, whereas 6-11 will not. Pur 0 0 (talk) 03:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indian English transliterates these as they are. Wikipedia:USEENGLISH applies here. IAST or ISO is not required Redtigerxyz Talk 11:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- But still, we should change them. The sources don't follow Wikipedia's guidelines, but we have to because, well, we are on Wikipedia. Same reason why we change Devanagari sources to ISO 15919. Just copy paste the changes I have marked here. Pur 0 0 (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)