This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
They have suspended participation, not withdrawn or cancelled the treaty, they will just no longer allow anyone to inspect their facilities. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
It does say these two quotes in the third source:
"It is not withdrawing from the treaty, but is suspending its participation,"
"On Tuesday, he also accused the US of "developing new types of nuclear weapons". He warned that if the United States conducts tests of new nuclear weapons, Russia would do the same."
I don't wanna do a modern journalism and accuse them of de facto withdrawing, but these things might be something to make note of in the article itself. DarmaniLink (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
People keep changing the infobox to say that it "expired" today, or that the suspension counts as an expiry. I do think that for something this critical and sensitive, it's worth being extremely pedantic about it and clarifying that the treaty has not expired, but Russia has suspended participation. Any thoughts on how best to convey that? Smallangryplanet (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
To my understanding, is that they will keep to the commitment of not increasing their nuclear arsenal, but they won't allow for the regular inspections.
Sounds sketchy, but, that's not my call to make for everyone else. Maybe it shouldn't be in the infobox, I'm not sure. DarmaniLink (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Where’s the link to the treaty? There should always be an easy to find link to the original source material.edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Give some specific examples of sections bias or anything you wish to dispute and we can work to resolve them.
Just saying "there's a problem" won't let it get fixed, have to know what it is. :)
If anything looks poorly worded or seems biased-ly worded, I'll try to fix it. DarmaniLink (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Here's the russian version of the treaty from the kremlin, pulled it off the Russian wikipedia page. Would you like to see this included, alongside the US version in sourcing? If you look at the bottom of the page, you can find the english version.