Gunnar Degelius has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 7, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Gunnar Degelius/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Comments edit
What a fine, fascinating and well-written article. Even moving, with the detail of his funeral. Comments soon. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
I really can find very little to say in the way of needed improvements.
- Peltigera canina is the Dog Lichen, so we might as well give its English name (and it certainly deserves its own article).
- The Swedish filosofie kandidat is mis-spelt.
- Dissertation need not be wikilinked.
- Suggest we repeat "Uppsala" rather than saying "It was at the [unnamed] university" as it's some sentences away from the previous mention.
- Suggest we gloss "docent" with "(reader)".
- I think "reader" might be confusing to those not familiar with UK-based academia; instead I glossed with "(an academic appointment below the rank of Professor) "
- "floristic papers on the lichens" - suggest we delete "floristic", it won't help the reader.
- "In the obituary she wrote about Degelius" -> "In her obituary of Degelius".
- Askim should be wikilinked at the first instance, not the next.
- Suggest we gloss Askim at first instance with ", a district of Gothenburg" as there's one in Norway as well.
- You might like to use |author-mask= to avoid repeating "Degelius, G." all the way down the list of works.
- It'd also be nice to add |ref=none to the works to avoid the Harv warnings that pop up.
- I know what Graphis scripta is but many readers won't. It'd be nice to gloss it with something like "the journal Graphis scripta, named for a species of lichen". A brilliant name, by the way.
- Why don't we have a picture of Degelia in the 'Eponymy' section?
That's about it from me. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review; I hope the changes are satisfactory. Esculenta (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Super, it's a pleasure to see such good things being brought to GA, which standard this article has certainly reached. I do hope you'll take the time to pick an article or two from the GAN queue to review! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)