Talk:Call to action (marketing)

2012

--Fmjohnson (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)This is a terrible entry. The concept of a call to action is as old as direct marketing. It predates the Web by more than 100 years.

Requested move 23 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) -- Calidum 00:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

---

Call to action (marketing) → Call to action – WP:DIFFCAPS says that capitalization is adequate disambiguation, therefore there is no confusion between this topic and Call to Action that a hatnote can't solve. Elizium23 (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

• I was inclined to support, but after looking into the issue a bit, I think that we are missing an article on the broader concept of a call to action as a statement designed to stir listeners to take steps to address an identified problem. The article as it stands is really not even about the general concept in marketing, but only the use with reference to websites. bd2412 T 00:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose - same concern as User talk:BD2412, plus I am wondering if call to action (website) would be a better title for the current article. It doesn't cover call to action (fundraising) for example. A dab page call to action (disambiguation) should also include the 1976 Catholic conference Call to Action etc, plus Jimmy Carter's A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power 2014 book ...seriously no article? if the president had only written a vampire cowboy comic it'd have an article for sure, much more encyclopaedic ;). In ictu oculi (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose "call to action" should become a disambiguation page, and also list uses for "A Call To Action" -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Plural of the abbreviation

If 'passersby' is the plural of 'passerby', should then not the plural of 'CTA' be 'CsTA'? Oliver Gramberg (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Cnv

Y un f 177.236.32.15 (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Xhhrhrh

Dhdhehjd 2806:2F0:3200:3483:B92D:DC3B:B172:B850 (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)