Talk:Aang
Latest comment: 21 days ago by 2801:1CA:E:1411:38A7:3642:A543:30DA in topic GAR
A user has requested that the Good article community check whether this article's GA status is in need of reassessment. This is just an alert and reassessment may not be necessary: any uninvolved editor can remove this tag. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
Aang has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do: Updated 2008-04-01
Priority 4
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
GAR edit
This article needs to have a GAR done again to revamp it, although one was published in 2021, it was not very exhaustive and they did not say what the problems were, and that time it maintained its status, but now it is much worse since there are many sections without references, The criticism section is very short and even more so if we talk about a renowned series such as Avatar: The Last Airbender. In conclusion, an article that has not aged well. 2801:1CA:E:1411:38A7:3642:A543:30DA (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)